Shahid Tulsiram Pawara vs State of Maharashtra — 131/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010005882026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
255/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
131/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
29-District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
292
Police Station
Shirpur Sangvi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shahid Tulsiram Pawara
Adv. Waghmare B. B.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 29-District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Order | |
| 04-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 21-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court rejected Shahid Tulsiram Pawara's anticipatory bail application for serious offenses including assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that since the applicant has been absconding since the FIR's inception and custodial interrogation is necessary for recovery of the wooden log weapon used in the alleged assault on 24/11/2025, pre-arrest bail cannot be granted to an absconded accused per the *Lavesh v. State* precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected Shahid Tulsiram Pawara's anticipatory bail application for serious offenses including assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that since the applicant has been absconding since the FIR's inception and custodial interrogation is necessary for recovery of the wooden log weapon used in the alleged assault on 24/11/2025, pre-arrest bail cannot be granted to an absconded accused per the *Lavesh v. State* precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts