Shubham Mangilal Jadhav vs State of Maharashta Advocate - A.G.P. 1 for the State — 126/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010005532026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
243/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
126/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
29
Police Station
Chalisgaon Road Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shubham Mangilal Jadhav
Adv. TATHED ANAND PARASMAL
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashta Advocate - A.G.P. 1 for the State
Informant
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order | |
| 02-03-2026 | Order | |
| 23-02-2026 | Order | |
| 20-02-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted bail to Shubham Mangilal Jadhav, accused of child sexual abuse under BNS Section 137(2) and POCSO Act Sections 8, 12. Finding substantial investigation complete, no recovery evidence, no criminal antecedents, and no flight risk, the judge released him on a Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions prohibiting witness tampering, evidence interference, and unauthorized departure from India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted bail to Shubham Mangilal Jadhav, accused of child sexual abuse under BNS Section 137(2) and POCSO Act Sections 8, 12. Finding substantial investigation complete, no recovery evidence, no criminal antecedents, and no flight risk, the judge released him on a Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions prohibiting witness tampering, evidence interference, and unauthorized departure from India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts