Rohidas alias Rohit Tryambak Shete vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.G.P. 1 for the State — 125/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010005522026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
242/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
125/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
Shirpur
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rohidas alias Rohit Tryambak Shete
Adv. WAGHAMARE BHAVESH BHAGWAN
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.G.P. 1 for the State
Hearing History
Judge: 28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order | |
| 05-03-2026 | Order | |
| 25-02-2026 | Order | |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule granted bail to accused Rohidas @ Rohit Tryambak Shete in a case involving illegal sand mining and assault on public servants. The court found that after 38 days of custody, the accused was entitled to bail despite serious charges under BNS Sections 109, 132, 121(1), 303(2), and 352, imposing stringent conditions including a Rs. 50,000 personal recognizance bond, weekly police station attendance, and prohibition on tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule granted bail to accused Rohidas @ Rohit Tryambak Shete in a case involving illegal sand mining and assault on public servants. The court found that after 38 days of custody, the accused was entitled to bail despite serious charges under BNS Sections 109, 132, 121(1), 303(2), and 352, imposing stringent conditions including a Rs. 50,000 personal recognizance bond, weekly police station attendance, and prohibition on tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts