Vicky alias Chetan Suresh Chaudhari vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.G.P. 1 for the State — 120/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 10th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010005212026
e-Filing Number
04-02-2026
Filing Number
229/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
120/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
Shirpur
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vicky alias Chetan Suresh Chaudhari
Adv. WAGHAMARE BHAVESH BHAGWAN
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.G.P. 1 for the State
Hearing History
Judge: 28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Order
Order
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order | |
| 05-03-2026 | Order | |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, rejected the bail application of Vicky @ Chetan Choudhari, accused of assaulting public servants during an illegal sand mining enforcement operation on 31.01.2026. The court found the offences grave and serious, noting that the accused and co-accused attacked a tahsil officer's team, manhandled them, and attempted to escape with an unregistered sand-laden vehicle. The court denied bail citing incomplete investigation, pending recovery of sand, necessity for custodial interrogation, and risk of further offences if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, rejected the bail application of Vicky @ Chetan Choudhari, accused of assaulting public servants during an illegal sand mining enforcement operation on 31.01.2026. The court found the offences grave and serious, noting that the accused and co-accused attacked a tahsil officer's team, manhandled them, and attempted to escape with an unregistered sand-laden vehicle. The court denied bail citing incomplete investigation, pending recovery of sand, necessity for custodial interrogation, and risk of further offences if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts