Nilesh Prakash Pawara vs State Of Maharashtra etc — 115/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010005052026
e-Filing Number
03-02-2026
Filing Number
220/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Registration No
115/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
Shirpur Sangvi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nilesh Prakash Pawara
Adv. Dusane N. G.
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra etc
De Facto Informant
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order | |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Nilesh Prakash Pawara, who was accused of sexual offences against a minor under Section 64(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 6 of the POCSO Act. The court held that despite the victim's no-objection, the gravity of the offence, the victim's minor status, and the need for custodial interrogation and medical investigations warranted denial of anticipatory bail, as a minor's consent is immaterial under POCSO provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Nilesh Prakash Pawara, who was accused of sexual offences against a minor under Section 64(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 6 of the POCSO Act. The court held that despite the victim's no-objection, the gravity of the offence, the victim's minor status, and the need for custodial interrogation and medical investigations warranted denial of anticipatory bail, as a minor's consent is immaterial under POCSO provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts