Rahul Pundlik Patil vs State Of Maharashtra — 94/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010003892026
e-Filing Number
28-01-2026
Filing Number
182/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
94/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
365
Police Station
West Deopur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rahul Pundlik Patil
Adv. TAWAR VIKRANTSINGH PRAVINSINGH
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Order
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order | |
| 04-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 25-02-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 20-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule granted bail to Rahul Pundlik Patil in a case involving alleged illegal prostitution under Sections 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 4, 5, 7(1)(a) of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The court allowed the bail application because the investigation had been completed and charge-sheet filed, noting that the applicant's earlier bail rejection was based on ongoing investigation. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety of the like amount, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, not leaving India without court permission, and maintaining residential address notification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule granted bail to Rahul Pundlik Patil in a case involving alleged illegal prostitution under Sections 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 4, 5, 7(1)(a) of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The court allowed the bail application because the investigation had been completed and charge-sheet filed, noting that the applicant's earlier bail rejection was based on ongoing investigation. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety of the like amount, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, not leaving India without court permission, and maintaining residential address notification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts