Rahul Pundlik Patil vs State Of Maharashtra — 94/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHDH010003892026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-01-2026

Filing Number

182/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

94/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

District and Session Court ,Dhule

Judge

3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

365

Police Station

West Deopur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Rahul Pundlik Patil

Adv. TAWAR VIKRANTSINGH PRAVINSINGH

Respondent(s)

State Of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Order

04-03-2026

Reply/Say

25-02-2026

Reply/Say

20-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule granted bail to Rahul Pundlik Patil in a case involving alleged illegal prostitution under Sections 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 4, 5, 7(1)(a) of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The court allowed the bail application because the investigation had been completed and charge-sheet filed, noting that the applicant's earlier bail rejection was based on ongoing investigation. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety of the like amount, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, not leaving India without court permission, and maintaining residential address notification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule granted bail to Rahul Pundlik Patil in a case involving alleged illegal prostitution under Sections 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 4, 5, 7(1)(a) of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The court allowed the bail application because the investigation had been completed and charge-sheet filed, noting that the applicant's earlier bail rejection was based on ongoing investigation. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety of the like amount, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, not leaving India without court permission, and maintaining residential address notification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Dhule All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case