The State of Maharashtra vs Jagtarsing @ Sodhi Jagirsing Shergir etc. — 24/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,364,397,201,120(b),34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHDH010003682023
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
131/2023
Filing Date
19-01-2023
Registration No
24/2023
Registration Date
19-01-2023
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
FIR Details
FIR Number
508
Police Station
Dhule City
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.G.P. 1 for the State
Respondent(s)
Jagtarsing @ Sodhi Jagirsing Shergir etc.
Suryaprakash Jayprakash Pande
Omprakash Mahavirprasad Mehriya
Aashish Omprakash Yadav
Hearing History
Judge: 28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
BAIL DENIED The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the regular bail application of four accused (Jagtarsing Shergir, Suryaprakash Pande, Omprakash Mehariya, and Aashish Yadav) in a murder case involving the death of taxi driver Deepak. The court found prima facie evidence implicating the accused, including circumstantial evidence such as CCTV footage placing them at the lodge, identification by witnesses, recovery of the victim's vehicle and ID card in their possession, and recovery of the murder weapon. Given the serious nature of the murder charge, previous criminal history, and high flight risk, bail was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL DENIED The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the regular bail application of four accused (Jagtarsing Shergir, Suryaprakash Pande, Omprakash Mehariya, and Aashish Yadav) in a murder case involving the death of taxi driver Deepak. The court found prima facie evidence implicating the accused, including circumstantial evidence such as CCTV footage placing them at the lodge, identification by witnesses, recovery of the victim's vehicle and ID card in their possession, and recovery of the murder weapon. Given the serious nature of the murder charge, previous criminal history, and high flight risk, bail was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts