The State of Maharashtra vs Surekha Naresh Kumar Advocate - Shaikh S. R. — 17/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHDH010001822022
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
107/2022
Filing Date
20-01-2022
Registration No
17/2022
Registration Date
20-01-2022
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Dhule
FIR Details
FIR Number
248
Police Station
Pimpalner
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. Tawar D. Y.
Respondent(s)
Surekha Naresh Kumar Advocate - Shaikh S. R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Dhule
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
BAIL GRANTED The court allowed the regular bail application of Surekha Naresh Kumar, accused of murdering her husband under IPC sections 302 and 201. She was released on furnishing two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each with conditions including court attendance, non-tampering with evidence, and quarterly police station reporting. The judge found that investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, and her detention unwarranted given her minor children's welfare needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL GRANTED The court allowed the regular bail application of Surekha Naresh Kumar, accused of murdering her husband under IPC sections 302 and 201. She was released on furnishing two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each with conditions including court attendance, non-tampering with evidence, and quarterly police station reporting. The judge found that investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, and her detention unwarranted given her minor children's welfare needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts