Vikas Namdeo Jungari vs The state of Maharashtra through P S O Korpana — 31/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHCH180003932026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

361/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Korpana

Judge

1-Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Korpana

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikas Namdeo Jungari

    Adv. MUSALE SHRINIWAS BHASKARRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The state of Maharashtra through P S O Korpana

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed accused Vikas Namdeo Junghari's application for return of his seized Samsung mobile handset (IMEI No. 354586854377488), finding him to be the rightful owner based on the bill of sale and FIR records. The phone was released upon execution of an Rs. 11,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that he produce it as directed, not alienate it, not use it for further offences, and not modify it until trial termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Korpana

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Korpana

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Korpana

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Korpana

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Korpana

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed accused Vikas Namdeo Junghari's application for return of his seized Samsung mobile handset (IMEI No. 354586854377488), finding him to be the rightful owner based on the bill of sale and FIR records. The phone was released upon execution of an Rs. 11,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that he produce it as directed, not alienate it, not use it for further offences, and not modify it until trial termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case