State of Maharashtra vs Pravin Chaitradas Gongal and — 658/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294,323,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHCH170010902020
Filing Number
1023/2020
Filing Date
07-Nov-2020
Registration No
658/2020
Registration Date
07-Nov-2020
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Chimur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
199
Police Station
Bhisi
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pravin Chaitradas Gongal and
-
2.Leelabai Chaitradas Gongal
-
3.Chaitradas Hiraman Gongal
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
14-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
This document contains witness testimony in Case 658/2020 (State of Maharashtra v. Pravin Chaitradas Gongal and others) before the First Class Magistrate in Chimur. Witness #02 (Amol Vinayak Lokhande, 36, farmer) testified that an incident occurred at Pravin Gongal's house on a 2020 date around 5:00 PM, where the accused allegedly abused and assaulted the complainant's wife. The witness was cross-examined by the defense counsel. The order dated 07/08/2025 records the completion of witness examination with no re-examination sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
18-Dec-2024
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
03-Dec-2024
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
08-Oct-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
27-Aug-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
24-Jun-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
18-Jun-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
16-Apr-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
08-Feb-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
18-Dec-2023
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
21-Oct-2023
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
23-Aug-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
06-May-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
04-Feb-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
17-Nov-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
05-Sep-2022
Summons_Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
04-May-2022
Summons_Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
04-Feb-2022
Summons_Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
08-Nov-2021
Summons_Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
09-Aug-2021
Summons_Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
11-Jun-2021
Unready Board
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
22-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 658/2020
This document contains witness testimony in Case 658/2020 (State of Maharashtra v. Pravin Chaitradas Gongal and others) before the First Class Magistrate in Chimur. Witness #02 (Amol Vinayak Lokhande, 36, farmer) testified that an incident occurred at Pravin Gongal's house on a 2020 date around 5:00 PM, where the accused allegedly abused and assaulted the complainant's wife. The witness was cross-examined by the defense counsel. The order dated 07/08/2025 records the completion of witness examination with no re-examination sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts