State of Maharashtra vs Ranjana bandu Sherki and other Advocate - Kale Maheshdatta Damodar — 251/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 297,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHCH170004302022
Filing Number
377/2022
Filing Date
09-May-2022
Registration No
251/2022
Registration Date
09-May-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Chimur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
Bhisi
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ranjana bandu Sherki and other Advocate - Kale Maheshdatta Damodar
-
2.Harshal Bandu Sherki
Adv. Kale Maheshdatta Damodar
-
3.Bandu Gauruji Sherki
Adv. Kale Maheshdatta Damodar
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
14-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
13-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
-
24-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
24-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
02-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
15-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
03-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
13-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
03-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
24-May-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
08-Feb-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
19-Dec-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
02-Nov-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
25-Sep-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
17-Aug-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
10-Jul-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
16-May-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
03-Apr-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
14-Feb-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
17-Dec-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
20-Oct-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
15-Sep-2022
Evidence
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ranjana Bandu Sherki (251/2022) The case involves a money dispute where petitioner Ranjana Sherki allegedly borrowed ₹25,000 from respondents and repaid only ₹7,000, with the balance of ₹18,000 remaining unpaid. After failed recovery attempts and alleged threatening behavior by the petitioner, respondents filed a police complaint. The court dismissed the petition in full, finding insufficient evidence to support petitioner's claims and rejecting her contentions regarding the loan details and repayment circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Sep-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
28-Jul-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Chimur.
-
16-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 251/2022
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ranjana Bandu Sherki (251/2022) The case involves a money dispute where petitioner Ranjana Sherki allegedly borrowed ₹25,000 from respondents and repaid only ₹7,000, with the balance of ₹18,000 remaining unpaid. After failed recovery attempts and alleged threatening behavior by the petitioner, respondents filed a police complaint. The court dismissed the petition in full, finding insufficient evidence to support petitioner's claims and rejecting her contentions regarding the loan details and repayment circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts