Vaishnavi Metal Industries Fattapur Through Nitin Arunrao Raut vs State Of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer — 21/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 27th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln
CNR: MHCH160005642026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
514/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
21/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Warora
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Warora.
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vaishnavi Metal Industries Fattapur Through Nitin Arunrao Raut
Adv. JIILATE SHAILENDRA MACHINDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court allowed Vaishnavi Metal Industries' application to recover their seized trolley used in illegal sand transportation, finding that the applicant was the registered owner with no involvement in the crime. The court ordered return of the vehicle on a ₹6 lakh indemnity bond with conditions restricting alienation and requiring cooperation in investigation, reasoning that independent confiscation proceedings before revenue authorities would not be prejudiced by the vehicle's release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Warora.
-
24-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Warora.
-
18-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Warora.
-
16-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Warora.
-
12-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Warora.
-
10-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Warora.
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2026
The court allowed Vaishnavi Metal Industries' application to recover their seized trolley used in illegal sand transportation, finding that the applicant was the registered owner with no involvement in the crime. The court ordered return of the vehicle on a ₹6 lakh indemnity bond with conditions restricting alienation and requiring cooperation in investigation, reasoning that independent confiscation proceedings before revenue authorities would not be prejudiced by the vehicle's release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts