State of Maharashtra vs Kanhaiya Suresh Agrawal — 133/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 78. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 31-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHCH150010472025

Filing Number

924/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

133/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Sindewahi

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

391

Police Station

Sindewahi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 78

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Chetan Ramesh Bhoi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kanhaiya Suresh Agrawal

Case History

  1. 31-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Jun-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: Case 133/2025 - State of Maharashtra v. Kanhaiya Suresh Agrawal Outcome: The petitioner's application is ALLOWED. The court ordered that the seized Samsung S23 mobile phone (IMEI: 351824510398652) shall remain in police custody for forensic examination rather than being returned to the respondent. Key Facts: The case involves charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 96, related to a woman harassment case. The respondent's mobile phone was seized as evidence containing alleged communications and intimate videos used to threaten and harass the complainant through multiple Instagram accounts. Reasoning: The court found that the mobile phone contains critical evidence including data, metadata, images, and videos necessary for technical analysis and forensic examination. Returning it to the respondent posed risks of evidence tampering, destruction, witness intimidation, and misuse of the stored content given AI-related concerns about creating/manipulating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  5. 30-May-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  6. 08-May-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  7. 05-May-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  8. 29-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  9. 21-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  10. 16-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  11. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  12. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  13. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  14. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

  15. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 133/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Case 133/2025 - State of Maharashtra v. Kanhaiya Suresh Agrawal Outcome: The petitioner's application is ALLOWED. The court ordered that the seized Samsung S23 mobile phone (IMEI: 351824510398652) shall remain in police custody for forensic examination rather than being returned to the respondent. Key Facts: The case involves charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 96, related to a woman harassment case. The respondent's mobile phone was seized as evidence containing alleged communications and intimate videos used to threaten and harass the complainant through multiple Instagram accounts. Reasoning: The court found that the mobile phone contains critical evidence including data, metadata, images, and videos necessary for technical analysis and forensic examination. Returning it to the respondent posed risks of evidence tampering, destruction, witness intimidation, and misuse of the stored content given AI-related concerns about creating/manipulating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case