Suraj Vijay Meshram vs State of Maharashtra Through Excise Department Chimur — 21/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHCH150003952026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

375/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

21/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Sindewahi

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

1.Suraj Vijay Meshram

Adv. Dalal Rameshchandra Bijupant

Respondent(s)

1.State of Maharashtra Through Excise Department Chimur

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
30-Mar-2026

Order on Exhibit

The court granted Suraj Vijay Meshram's petition under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of seized vehicle parts (Chassis No. ME4KC401LMA316599 and Engine No. KC40EA0316351) in an excise case, while rejecting the State's objections about misuse. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 50,000 security bond, prohibition on alterations or transfer of the goods, and requirement to maintain photographic records, balancing the petitioner's property rights against investigation concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
30-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.
18-Mar-2026

Awaiting Notice

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Sindewahi.
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
12-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 21/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted Suraj Vijay Meshram's petition under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of seized vehicle parts (Chassis No. ME4KC401LMA316599 and Engine No. KC40EA0316351) in an excise case, while rejecting the State's objections about misuse. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 50,000 security bond, prohibition on alterations or transfer of the goods, and requirement to maintain photographic records, balancing the petitioner's property rights against investigation concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.