Swapnil Madhusudan Petkar vs Ankush Shamrao Kankadalwar and other Advocate - Adarsh N. Gedam — 6/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34, 37. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHCH140002062026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

37/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Saoli

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Saoli.

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34, 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Swapnil Madhusudan Petkar

    Adv. SHENDE PUNDLIK PANDURANG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ankush Shamrao Kankadalwar and other Advocate - Adarsh N. Gedam

  2. 2.Kamalabai Shamrao Kankadalwar

    Adv. Adarsh N. Gedam

  3. 3.Secretory Grampanchayat Office Anargaon

    Adv. Adarsh N. Gedam

  4. 4.Sarpanch Grampanchayat Office Antargaon

    Adv. Adarsh N. Gedam

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Saoli.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Saoli.

  4. 02-May-2026

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Saoli.

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Saoli.

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Saoli.

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Saoli.

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY In Civil Suit No. 06/2026, plaintiff Swapnil sought a status-quo order to prevent defendants Ankush and others from continuing construction on adjacent properties, alleging illegal construction without marginal space. The court rejected the application, finding that the Gram Panchayat had authorized the construction under the Gharkul Scheme and photographs did not clearly establish violation of building bylaws. The court permitted construction to continue at defendants' own risk, while reserving the plaintiff's right to seek demolition if construction is subsequently found illegal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Saoli.

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY In Civil Suit No. 06/2026, plaintiff Swapnil sought a status-quo order to prevent defendants Ankush and others from continuing construction on adjacent properties, alleging illegal construction without marginal space. The court rejected the application, finding that the Gram Panchayat had authorized the construction under the Gharkul Scheme and photographs did not clearly establish violation of building bylaws. The court permitted construction to continue at defendants' own risk, while reserving the plaintiff's right to seek demolition if construction is subsequently found illegal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case