State of Maharastra Thr. P. S. Talodhi vs Harshwardhan Yoginath Bele Advocate - Sahare Vijayanand Pitambar — 735/2018
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65a,83. Status: N.B.W._Ready. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHCH110011252018
Filing Number
1039/2018
Filing Date
13-Dec-2018
Registration No
735/2018
Registration Date
13-Dec-2018
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Nagbhid
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
Talodhi
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharastra Thr. P. S. Talodhi
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Harshwardhan Yoginath Bele Advocate - Sahare Vijayanand Pitambar
-
2.Sandip Chatrapal Gurharikar
Adv. Sahare Vijayanand Pitambar
-
3.Anand Sudesh Thakur
Adv. Sahare Vijayanand Pitambar
-
4.Parag Suresh Dange
Adv. Sahare Vijayanand Pitambar
-
5.Kamalakar Yashwant Alone
Adv. Sahare Vijayanand Pitambar
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Mar-2026
N.B.W._Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
10-Nov-2025
N.B.W._Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
21-Jul-2025
N.B.W._Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
29-May-2025
N.B.W._Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
24-Mar-2025
N.B.W._Ready
-
07-Jan-2025
N.B.W._Ready
-
11-Nov-2024
N.B.W._Ready
-
20-Aug-2024
N.B.W._Ready
-
04-Jul-2024
N.B.W._Ready
-
19-Apr-2024
N.B.W._Ready
-
30-Mar-2024
N.B.W._Ready
-
13-Mar-2024
N.B.W._Ready
-
28-Feb-2024
N.B.W._Ready
-
21-Feb-2024
N.B.W._Ready
-
05-Jan-2024
N.B.W._Ready
-
28-Nov-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
27-Sep-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
07-Aug-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
27-Jun-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
15-May-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
27-Mar-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
03-Feb-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
16-Dec-2022
N.B.W._Ready
-
21-Oct-2022
N.B.W._Ready
-
07-Oct-2022
N.B.W._Ready
-
12-Aug-2022
N.B.W._Ready
-
27-Jun-2022
N.B.W._Ready
-
22-Feb-2022
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
27-Oct-2021
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
03-Sep-2021
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
15-Apr-2021
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
10-Dec-2020
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
14-Aug-2020
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
11-May-2020
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
14-Feb-2020
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
11-Nov-2019
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
24-Jul-2019
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
22-Apr-2019
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: 735/2018 The applicant sought release of a Samsung J7 NXT mobile phone seized during a liquor smuggling investigation (Crime No. 56/2018). Though the applicant proved ownership via purchase bill and Aadhar card, and the charge-sheet was filed, the court rejected the application on 22-04-2019. The magistrate found the mobile was seized as evidence under Section 165 Cr.P.C. and could not be released, as it was used to locate and alert accused persons during the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2019
Appearance
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
18-Apr-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
16-Apr-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
10-Apr-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
09-Apr-2019
Reply/Say
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
05-Apr-2019
Reply/Say
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
03-Apr-2019
Reply/Say
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
01-Apr-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 735/2018
Case Summary: 735/2018 The applicant sought release of a Samsung J7 NXT mobile phone seized during a liquor smuggling investigation (Crime No. 56/2018). Though the applicant proved ownership via purchase bill and Aadhar card, and the charge-sheet was filed, the court rejected the application on 22-04-2019. The magistrate found the mobile was seized as evidence under Section 165 Cr.P.C. and could not be released, as it was used to locate and alert accused persons during the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts