State of Maharastra Thr. P. S. Talodhi vs Geeta Devendra Shendre Advocate - Ghutke Anandkumar Raghobaji — 350/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHCH110006382021
Filing Number
580/2021
Filing Date
06-Aug-2021
Registration No
350/2021
Registration Date
06-Aug-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Nagbhid
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
74
Police Station
Talodhi
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharastra Thr. P. S. Talodhi
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Geeta Devendra Shendre Advocate - Ghutke Anandkumar Raghobaji
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment
Summary of Case 350/2021 The court acquitted the respondent of charges under Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally possessed narcotic/liquor materials. The single eyewitness (panchnama witness) provided contradictory testimony and did not support the prosecution's case, and no credible documentary evidence was presented to establish possession of the seized substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
06-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
16-Jan-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
06-Jan-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
11-Dec-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
01-Oct-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
31-May-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
-
03-Feb-2025
Evidence
-
13-Jan-2025
Evidence
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence
-
18-Nov-2024
Evidence
-
09-Oct-2024
Evidence
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence
-
31-Jul-2024
Evidence
-
02-Jul-2024
Evidence
-
13-May-2024
Evidence
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
-
06-Mar-2024
Evidence
-
12-Feb-2024
Evidence
-
15-Jan-2024
Evidence
-
16-Dec-2023
Evidence
-
20-Nov-2023
Evidence
-
13-Oct-2023
Evidence
-
08-Sep-2023
Evidence
-
08-Aug-2023
Evidence
-
14-Jul-2023
Evidence
-
14-Jul-2023
Evidence
-
09-Jun-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
26-Apr-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
08-Mar-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
08-Mar-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
16-Jan-2023
N.B.W._Ready
-
03-Dec-2022
N.B.W._Ready
-
06-Oct-2022
N.B.W._Ready
-
11-Aug-2022
N.B.W._Ready
-
25-Jun-2022
N.B.W._Ready
-
15-Jun-2022
Summons_Ready
-
11-Apr-2022
Summons_Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
07-Dec-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 350/2021
Summary of Case 350/2021 The court acquitted the respondent of charges under Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally possessed narcotic/liquor materials. The single eyewitness (panchnama witness) provided contradictory testimony and did not support the prosecution's case, and no credible documentary evidence was presented to establish possession of the seized substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts