State of Maharastra Thr. P. S. Talodhi vs Bhagabai Suresh Neware — 31/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e,f. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 03rd June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHCH110000442020
Filing Number
41/2020
Filing Date
08-Jan-2020
Registration No
31/2020
Registration Date
08-Jan-2020
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Nagbhid
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
Decision Date
03-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
271
Police Station
Talodhi
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharastra Thr. P. S. Talodhi
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhagabai Suresh Neware
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bhagabai Suresh Neware (31/2020) The court acquitted the respondent Bhagabai Suresh Neware of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949 (Section 65(E)(F)) and IPC Section 188. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused possessed intoxicating liquor and raw materials for manufacture without authorization. Critical evidentiary gaps—including lack of documentary proof of house ownership, absence of written notice to the panchas, and unsubstantiated seizure records—created sufficient doubt regarding the accused's involvement. The court held the prosecution's evidence unreliable and internally inconsistent, resulting in acquittal with release of the accused and disposal of seized materials per standard procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
18-May-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
09-Apr-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
18-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
14-May-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence
-
24-Dec-2024
Plea / Particulars
-
30-Nov-2024
Filing of Surety
-
11-Nov-2024
Filing of Surety
-
08-Oct-2024
Filing of Surety
-
29-Jul-2024
Summons_Ready
-
17-May-2024
Summons_Ready
-
28-Mar-2024
Summons_Ready
-
23-Feb-2024
Summons_Ready
-
10-Jan-2024
Summons_Ready
-
04-Dec-2023
Summons_Ready
-
13-Oct-2023
Summons_Ready
-
19-Aug-2023
Summons_Ready
-
11-Jul-2023
Summons_Ready
-
26-May-2023
Summons_Ready
-
11-Apr-2023
Summons_Ready
-
20-Feb-2023
Summons_Ready
-
31-Dec-2022
Summons_Ready
-
14-Nov-2022
Summons_Ready
-
01-Sep-2022
Summons_Ready
-
06-Jul-2022
Summons_Ready
-
07-Mar-2022
Summons_Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
10-Nov-2021
Summons_Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
29-Jul-2021
Summons_Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
22-Mar-2021
Summons_Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
10-Nov-2020
Summons_Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
27-Jul-2020
Summons_Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.M.F.C. Nagbhid.
-
02-May-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 31/2020
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bhagabai Suresh Neware (31/2020) The court acquitted the respondent Bhagabai Suresh Neware of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949 (Section 65(E)(F)) and IPC Section 188. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused possessed intoxicating liquor and raw materials for manufacture without authorization. Critical evidentiary gaps—including lack of documentary proof of house ownership, absence of written notice to the panchas, and unsubstantiated seizure records—created sufficient doubt regarding the accused's involvement. The court held the prosecution's evidence unreliable and internally inconsistent, resulting in acquittal with release of the accused and disposal of seized materials per standard procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts