Umesh Tulshiram Patare vs State of Maharashtra through Police Station Mul — 41/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHCH100004592026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

431/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Mul

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Mul

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

1.Umesh Tulshiram Patare

Adv. MUDDAMWAR SAGAR CHANDRAKANT

Respondent(s)

1.State of Maharashtra through Police Station Mul

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
02-Apr-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: Cri. M.A. No. 41/2026 The court allowed Umesh Tulshiram Patare's application for interim custody of two Vivo Y21 mobiles seized under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that Patare established ownership through purchase bills and Aadhaar card, and reasoned that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration and value loss to the devices with no other claimants appearing. The mobiles were released on supratnama bond of Rs. 14,500 with conditions: Patare must produce them when required, cannot alienate or alter them, and must execute an indemnity bond guaranteeing their return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
02-Apr-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Mul
30-Mar-2026

Hearing

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Mul
25-Mar-2026

Hearing

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Mul
23-Mar-2026

Hearing

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Mul
18-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Mul
13-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
13-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri. M.A. No. 41/2026 The court allowed Umesh Tulshiram Patare's application for interim custody of two Vivo Y21 mobiles seized under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that Patare established ownership through purchase bills and Aadhaar card, and reasoned that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration and value loss to the devices with no other claimants appearing. The mobiles were released on supratnama bond of Rs. 14,500 with conditions: Patare must produce them when required, cannot alienate or alter them, and must execute an indemnity bond guaranteeing their return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.