Amit Suresh Chilmulwar vs State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Gondpipri — 33/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHCH090003082026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
291/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Gondpip
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
131
Police Station
Gondpipari
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Amit Suresh Chilmulwar
Adv. Sunil Z. Zade
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Gondpipri
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court allowed Amit Suresh Chilmulwar's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering release of his seized TVS Raider motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-34-CF-9903) upon execution of a ₹70,000 indemnity bond. The court found the applicant was the rightful owner and that prolonged police custody would damage the vehicle and defeat his ownership rights. Release was conditioned on the applicant not selling/transferring the vehicle, making alterations, and producing it as required during investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
-
20-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
-
18-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2026
The court allowed Amit Suresh Chilmulwar's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering release of his seized TVS Raider motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-34-CF-9903) upon execution of a ₹70,000 indemnity bond. The court found the applicant was the rightful owner and that prolonged police custody would damage the vehicle and defeat his ownership rights. Release was conditioned on the applicant not selling/transferring the vehicle, making alterations, and producing it as required during investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts