Amit Suresh Chilmulwar vs State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Gondpipri Advocate - A.P.P. — 32/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHCH090003052026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

288/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Gondpip

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

131

Police Station

Gondpipari

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amit Suresh Chilmulwar

    Adv. Sunil Z. Zade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Gondpipri Advocate - A.P.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed Amit Suresh Chilmulwar's application to release his seized Redmi Note 9 Pro Max mobile, finding him to be the rightful owner based on Aadhar card and mobile bill documentation. The mobile was ordered to be returned upon execution of an indemnity bond of ₹14,500 and subject to conditions including non-sale/transfer, no modifications, and production during investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Amit Suresh Chilmulwar's application to release his seized Redmi Note 9 Pro Max mobile, finding him to be the rightful owner based on Aadhar card and mobile bill documentation. The mobile was ordered to be returned upon execution of an indemnity bond of ₹14,500 and subject to conditions including non-sale/transfer, no modifications, and production during investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case