Kalidas Maroti Tarode vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Gondpipri — 31/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHCH090002952026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
280/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Gondpip
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
129
Police Station
Gondpipari
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kalidas Maroti Tarode
Adv. URADE AKSHAY AWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Gondpipri
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Case 31/2026: Kalidas Maroti Tarode v. State of Maharashtra The court allowed Kalidas Maroti Tarode's application for release of his seized TVS Jupiter 125 two-wheeler (Reg. No. MH-34-CT-5956), finding him the rightful owner based on verified documents. The vehicle was returned subject to a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and conditions prohibiting sale, modification, and requiring production during investigation/trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
-
20-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
-
17-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge, Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Gondpipari
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 31/2026
Summary of Case 31/2026: Kalidas Maroti Tarode v. State of Maharashtra The court allowed Kalidas Maroti Tarode's application for release of his seized TVS Jupiter 125 two-wheeler (Reg. No. MH-34-CT-5956), finding him the rightful owner based on verified documents. The vehicle was returned subject to a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and conditions prohibiting sale, modification, and requiring production during investigation/trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts