The State of Maharashtra vs Jana Rajesh Thakur Advocate - Dange Rajesh Charandas — 298/2021

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHCH080006432021

Filing Number

518/2021

Filing Date

13-Oct-2021

Registration No

298/2021

Registration Date

13-Oct-2021

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Bramhapuri

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

658

Police Station

Bramhapuri

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

1.The State of Maharashtra

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

1.Jana Rajesh Thakur Advocate - Dange Rajesh Charandas

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
04-May-2026

Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jana Rajesh Thakur Advocate (298/2021) The court acquitted the accused, Jana Rajesh Thakur, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 22 bottles of foreign liquor (90ml each) were found in the accused's possession on 28 December 2020. The sole prosecution witness did not support the case, provided no credible evidence of seizure, and the chemical laboratory report did not establish the alleged liquor recovery. Consequently, the court granted absolute acquittal and cancelled the accused's bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
04-May-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
29-Apr-2026

Order

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
08-Apr-2026

Order

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
01-Apr-2026

Order

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
18-Mar-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
09-Mar-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
18-Feb-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
04-Feb-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
24-Dec-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
18-Nov-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
23-Sep-2025

Evidence

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
05-Aug-2025

Evidence

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
24-Jun-2025

Evidence

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
28-Apr-2025

Evidence

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
24-Feb-2025

Evidence

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
21-Dec-2024

Evidence

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
18-Nov-2024

Evidence

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
20-Aug-2024

Evidence

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
27-May-2024

Evidence

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
13-Mar-2024

Evidence

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
13-Dec-2023

Plea / Particulars
01-Nov-2023

Plea / Particulars
06-Sep-2023

Plea / Particulars
06-Apr-2023

Plea / Particulars
05-Jan-2023

Plea / Particulars
04-Oct-2022

Plea / Particulars

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
25-Jul-2022

Plea / Particulars

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
27-Apr-2022

Plea / Particulars

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
15-Jan-2022

Plea / Particulars

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
30-Oct-2021

Plea / Particulars

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
13-Oct-2021

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
13-Oct-2021

Case filed

Registration No. 298/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jana Rajesh Thakur Advocate (298/2021) The court acquitted the accused, Jana Rajesh Thakur, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 22 bottles of foreign liquor (90ml each) were found in the accused's possession on 28 December 2020. The sole prosecution witness did not support the case, provided no credible evidence of seizure, and the chemical laboratory report did not establish the alleged liquor recovery. Consequently, the court granted absolute acquittal and cancelled the accused's bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.