The State of Maharashtra vs Ranjish Purushottam Mandale Advocate - Dange Rajesh Charandas — 186/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),83. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHCH080004562021
Filing Number
355/2021
Filing Date
12-Aug-2021
Registration No
186/2021
Registration Date
12-Aug-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Bramhapuri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
392
Police Station
Bramhapuri
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ranjish Purushottam Mandale Advocate - Dange Rajesh Charandas
-
2.Pramod Haridas Uikey
Adv. Dange Rajesh Charandas
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court acquitted the respondents (Ranjish Purushottam Mandale, Dange Rajesh Charandas, and Pramod Haridas Uikey) of charges under Maharashtra Excise Act sections 65(a) and 83, finding insufficient evidence that they possessed or transported foreign liquor. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness contradicted the investigation and no corroborating documentary evidence linked the seized bottles to the accused's custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
09-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
18-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
01-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
07-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
14-Jan-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
09-Sep-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
03-Jul-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
29-Feb-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
29-Jan-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
01-Dec-2023
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
30-Sep-2023
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
28-Jul-2023
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
29-May-2023
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
09-Mar-2023
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
31-Dec-2022
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
18-Oct-2022
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
10-Aug-2022
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
28-Apr-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
08-Feb-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
16-Nov-2021
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
29-Oct-2021
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Bramhapuri.
-
12-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 186/2021
The court acquitted the respondents (Ranjish Purushottam Mandale, Dange Rajesh Charandas, and Pramod Haridas Uikey) of charges under Maharashtra Excise Act sections 65(a) and 83, finding insufficient evidence that they possessed or transported foreign liquor. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness contradicted the investigation and no corroborating documentary evidence linked the seized bottles to the accused's custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts