Naresh Ananad Gundapelli vs State Of Maharashtra Through PSO Ballarpur Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 37/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHCH060009082026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

865/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ballarpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naresh Ananad Gundapelli

    Adv. Sayyad Inayat Rajjab

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra Through PSO Ballarpur Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted interim possession of a seized Vivo Y29 mobile phone to petitioner Naresh Anand Gundlapelli, who was charged under the Maharashtra Gambling Act. The court found the petitioner is the rightful owner based on purchase receipts and neither the investigating officer nor prosecutor disputed ownership. The court held that keeping electronic devices at police stations is impracticable and risks damage, and that safeguards through conditions are adequate. The phone was released on a ₹30,000 indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting sale, illegal use, or modifications, and requiring court approval for any disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted interim possession of a seized Vivo Y29 mobile phone to petitioner Naresh Anand Gundlapelli, who was charged under the Maharashtra Gambling Act. The court found the petitioner is the rightful owner based on purchase receipts and neither the investigating officer nor prosecutor disputed ownership. The court held that keeping electronic devices at police stations is impracticable and risks damage, and that safeguards through conditions are adequate. The phone was released on a ₹30,000 indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting sale, illegal use, or modifications, and requiring court approval for any disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case