Imran Rahim Sheikh vs State Of Maharashtra Through PSO Ballarpur Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 35/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHCH060008152026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

778/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ballarpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Imran Rahim Sheikh

    Adv. Khanke Bandu Shamrao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra Through PSO Ballarpur Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court partially allowed Imran Rahim Sheikh's application for interim possession of his seized Apple iPhone, ruling that keeping electronic devices at police stations is impractical and risks damage. The court granted possession subject to a Rs. 1 lakh indemnity bond and strict conditions: he cannot sell or transfer the device, must produce it on demand, cannot use it illegally, and must preserve all data intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed Imran Rahim Sheikh's application for interim possession of his seized Apple iPhone, ruling that keeping electronic devices at police stations is impractical and risks damage. The court granted possession subject to a Rs. 1 lakh indemnity bond and strict conditions: he cannot sell or transfer the device, must produce it on demand, cannot use it illegally, and must preserve all data intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case