Ramdayal Ramsumer Nishad vs State Of Maharashtra Through PSO Ballarpur Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 27/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHCH060008102026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

773/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ballarpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

1.Ramdayal Ramsumer Nishad

Adv. Khanke Bandu Shamrao

Respondent(s)

1.State Of Maharashtra Through PSO Ballarpur Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
18-Mar-2026

Order on Exhibit

The court granted interim possession of a seized Hero Splender motorcycle to applicant Ramdayal Ramsumer Nishad, finding no dispute over his ownership and relying on settled law that seized property should not remain at police stations indefinitely. The vehicle was released on a Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, illegal use, and requiring production when demanded by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
18-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.
17-Mar-2026

Hearing

Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
07-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 27/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted interim possession of a seized Hero Splender motorcycle to applicant Ramdayal Ramsumer Nishad, finding no dispute over his ownership and relying on settled law that seized property should not remain at police stations indefinitely. The vehicle was released on a Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, illegal use, and requiring production when demanded by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.