Tushar Sudhakar Pogade vs State Of Maharashtra Through PSO Ballarpur Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 31/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 501,497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHCH060008052026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

768/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ballarpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0314

Police Station

Ballarpur

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 501,497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tushar Sudhakar Pogade

    Adv. SUMIT BALKUNAL AMTE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra Through PSO Ballarpur Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court partially allowed Tushar Sudhakar Pogade's application for interim possession of his seized Vivo V30 mobile phone under Section 457 CrPC, ruling that since ownership was undisputed and electronic devices shouldn't remain idle at police stations, the applicant was entitled to recover the device. The court granted possession subject to a Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond and strict conditions including non-disposal, non-use for illegal purposes, preservation of data, and production on court demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed Tushar Sudhakar Pogade's application for interim possession of his seized Vivo V30 mobile phone under Section 457 CrPC, ruling that since ownership was undisputed and electronic devices shouldn't remain idle at police stations, the applicant was entitled to recover the device. The court granted possession subject to a Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond and strict conditions including non-disposal, non-use for illegal purposes, preservation of data, and production on court demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case