Manoj Lalaji Sharma vs State Of Maharashtra Through PSO Ballarpur Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 33/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHCH060008032026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

766/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ballarpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Lalaji Sharma

    Adv. Khanke Bandu Shamrao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra Through PSO Ballarpur Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court partially allowed Manoj Lalji Sharma's application for interim possession of his Vivo Y56 mobile phone seized during a gambling investigation, finding no dispute over his ownership and citing settled law against indefinite police custody of electronic devices. The applicant was granted possession upon executing a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and agreeing to conditions including non-disposal without court permission, production on demand, preservation of data, and non-use for illegal purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge, Jr.Dn, and J.m.f.c., Ballarpur.

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed Manoj Lalji Sharma's application for interim possession of his Vivo Y56 mobile phone seized during a gambling investigation, finding no dispute over his ownership and citing settled law against indefinite police custody of electronic devices. The applicant was granted possession upon executing a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and agreeing to conditions including non-disposal without court permission, production on demand, preservation of data, and non-use for illegal purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case