State of Maharashtra vs Alimuddin Samiruddin Ansari Advocate - Hazare Datta Krushnaji — 119/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307. Status: Formal Hearing. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

Formal Hearing Next hearing 29-Jul-2026

Sessions Case

CNR: MHCH010020602022

Filing Number

952/2022

Filing Date

26-Sep-2022

Registration No

119/2022

Registration Date

26-Sep-2022

Court

District and Session Court , Chandrapur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

322

Police Station

Chandrapur City

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Alimuddin Samiruddin Ansari Advocate - Hazare Datta Krushnaji

Case History

  1. 29-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    Formal Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  3. 20-May-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  6. 16-Dec-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  7. 08-Oct-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  9. 28-Jul-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  10. 19-May-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  11. 17-Mar-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  12. 18-Jan-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  13. 16-Nov-2024

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Chandrapur

  14. 19-Sep-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-3 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  15. 18-Jul-2024

    Charge

    District Judge-3 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  16. 30-May-2024

    Appearance

    District Judge-3 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  17. 25-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    District Judge-3 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  18. 28-Mar-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    District Judge-3 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  19. 22-Feb-2024

    Order

    District Judge-3 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  20. 30-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-3 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  21. 06-Nov-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-3 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  22. 17-Aug-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-2 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  23. 23-Jun-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-2 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  24. 15-May-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-2 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  25. 03-Apr-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-2 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  26. 16-Feb-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-2 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  27. 16-Jan-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary - Sessions Case No. 119/2022 The application for custody of a seized Vivo mobile phone (worth Rs. 9,500) was allowed on 16 January 2023. The court ordered release of the device to the applicant (Alimuddin Ansari) upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 10,000, with conditions that he cannot sell or alienate it and must produce it during trial. The police were directed to photograph the mobile before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  28. 16-Jan-2023

    Appearance

    District Judge-2 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  29. 17-Nov-2022

    Order

    District Judge-2 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  30. 13-Oct-2022

    Filing of Surety

    District Judge-2 A.S.J. Chandrapur

  31. 26-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 26-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 119/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - Sessions Case No. 119/2022 The application for custody of a seized Vivo mobile phone (worth Rs. 9,500) was allowed on 16 January 2023. The court ordered release of the device to the applicant (Alimuddin Ansari) upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 10,000, with conditions that he cannot sell or alienate it and must produce it during trial. The police were directed to photograph the mobile before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case