Juhu Kishank Co Op Hsg Soc Ltd And 2 Ors vs Rukmani C Kevalramani And 9 Ors — 103466/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--OTHER on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

NOTICE OF MOTION

CNR: MHCC010087782025

Filing Number

108995/2025

Filing Date

01-Jul-2025

Registration No

103466/2025

Registration Date

01-Jul-2025

Court

City Civil Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--OTHER

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Juhu Kishank Co Op Hsg Soc Ltd And 2 Ors

    Adv. ADV_________

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rukmani C Kevalramani And 9 Ors

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Notice of Motion

    Case Summary: Notice of Motion No. 3466/2025 The Bombay City Civil Court rejected the plaintiff's motion seeking Rs. 1,00,50,000 in arrears of maintenance from defendants, finding the plaintiff misinterpreted a 2008 High Court order. The court ruled that Rs. 50,000 was not mandated as fixed monthly maintenance but rather a general direction to pay monthly maintenance, and defendants substantially complied by depositing Rs. 3,50,000 with the court, negating any wilful disobedience claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Nm Orders

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Restored

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Disposed

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  9. 14-Jan-2026

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Nm Orders

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  13. 03-Sep-2025

    Reply

  14. 31-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 01-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103466/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Notice of Motion No. 3466/2025 The Bombay City Civil Court rejected the plaintiff's motion seeking Rs. 1,00,50,000 in arrears of maintenance from defendants, finding the plaintiff misinterpreted a 2008 High Court order. The court ruled that Rs. 50,000 was not mandated as fixed monthly maintenance but rather a general direction to pay monthly maintenance, and defendants substantially complied by depositing Rs. 3,50,000 with the court, negating any wilful disobedience claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case