Santosh Bhiku Talar vs 1.Shripat Ganpat Bait 2.Shrikant Shripat Bait 3.Prashant Shripat Bait 4.Vikrant Shripat Bait — 102043/2017

Case under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act Section 9. Status: Recording Evidence. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Recording Evidence Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

CNR: MHCC010081502017

Filing Number

108633/2017

Filing Date

14-Aug-2017

Registration No

102043/2017

Registration Date

11-Sep-2017

Court

City Civil Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Bhiku Talar

    Adv. Suresh Dubey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.1.Shripat Ganpat Bait 2.Shrikant Shripat Bait 3.Prashant Shripat Bait 4.Vikrant Shripat Bait

  2. 2.5.Simala Nagar Rahivashi Sangh

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Recording Evidence P.H.

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    Recording Evidence P.H.

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  9. 03-Oct-2025

    Recording Evidence P.H.

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  10. 14-Aug-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  11. 29-Apr-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  12. 02-Apr-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  13. 07-Mar-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  14. 22-Jan-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  15. 19-Dec-2024

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  16. 07-Nov-2024

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  17. 23-Sep-2024

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  18. 08-Aug-2024

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  19. 28-Jun-2024

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  20. 05-Apr-2024

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  21. 13-Feb-2024

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  22. 12-Dec-2023

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  23. 03-Nov-2023

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  24. 05-Oct-2023

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  25. 05-Aug-2023

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  26. 28-Apr-2023

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  27. 21-Feb-2023

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  28. 10-Dec-2022

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  29. 25-Nov-2022

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  30. 10-Oct-2022

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  31. 28-Jul-2022

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  32. 22-Jun-2022

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  33. 23-Mar-2022

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  34. 23-Feb-2022

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  35. 08-Dec-2021

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  36. 03-Sep-2021

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  37. 17-Jul-2021

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  38. 07-May-2021

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  39. 22-Mar-2021

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  40. 06-Feb-2021

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  41. 10-Dec-2020

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  42. 09-Oct-2020

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  43. 14-Aug-2020

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  44. 12-Jun-2020

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  45. 27-May-2020

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  46. 05-May-2020

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  47. 16-Apr-2020

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  48. 25-Feb-2020

    Framing Issues

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  49. 21-Jan-2020

    Recording Evidence

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  50. 12-Dec-2019

    Framing Issues

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  51. 17-Oct-2019

    Framing Issues

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  52. 30-Aug-2019

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  53. 12-Jul-2019

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  54. 10-Jul-2019

    Notice of MotionView PDF

    Case Summary: Santosh Bhiku Talar v. Shripat Ganpat Bait & Ors. (Case 102043/2017) Plaintiff sought temporary injunction to prevent defendants from occupying a 91 sq. ft. room (DX 302, Nepeansea Road, Mumbai) purchased by his late father in 1975. Plaintiff claimed defendants were gratuitous licensees who promised to vacate but refused after his father's death in April 2017. Defendants counter-claimed they were co-owners with equal contribution to property renovation in 1988 and possessed valid government-issued identity documents at the address. Court Order (July 12, 2019): The temporary injunction motion was dismissed. The court found plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience, noting the disputed title and defendants' settled possession preclude eviction via temporary injunction. However, both parties were directed to maintain status quo regarding the property until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  55. 10-Jul-2019

    Nm Orders

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  56. 27-Jun-2019

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  57. 25-Apr-2019

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  58. 05-Apr-2019

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  59. 25-Mar-2019

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  60. 05-Mar-2019

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  61. 25-Feb-2019

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  62. 20-Feb-2019

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  63. 24-Jan-2019

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  64. 20-Dec-2018

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  65. 29-Nov-2018

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  66. 24-Oct-2018

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  67. 27-Sep-2018

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  68. 06-Aug-2018

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  69. 09-Jul-2018

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  70. 10-Apr-2018

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  71. 21-Dec-2017

    Nm Replyrejoinder

    Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge

  72. 03-Oct-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  73. 14-Aug-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102043/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Santosh Bhiku Talar v. Shripat Ganpat Bait & Ors. (Case 102043/2017) Plaintiff sought temporary injunction to prevent defendants from occupying a 91 sq. ft. room (DX 302, Nepeansea Road, Mumbai) purchased by his late father in 1975. Plaintiff claimed defendants were gratuitous licensees who promised to vacate but refused after his father's death in April 2017. Defendants counter-claimed they were co-owners with equal contribution to property renovation in 1988 and possessed valid government-issued identity documents at the address. Court Order (July 12, 2019): The temporary injunction motion was dismissed. The court found plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience, noting the disputed title and defendants' settled possession preclude eviction via temporary injunction. However, both parties were directed to maintain status quo regarding the property until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case