Mrs. Ekta wd/o. Hemchandra Shantilal Shah vs 1.Mr. Hemant Shantilal Shah 2. The Saraswat Co-op. Bank Ltd. 3. Life Insurance Corpn. of India — 101264/2017
Case under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act Section 9. Status: Admission Denial. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
CNR: MHCC010052322017
Filing Number
105528/2017
Filing Date
24-May-2017
Registration No
101264/2017
Registration Date
24-May-2017
Court
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Judge
2-Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mrs. Ekta wd/o. Hemchandra Shantilal Shah
Adv. Mr. Pankaj M. Bhatt
Respondent(s)
-
1.1.Mr. Hemant Shantilal Shah 2. The Saraswat Co-op. Bank Ltd. 3. Life Insurance Corpn. of India
Case History
-
24-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Admission Denial
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Admission Denial
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Recording Evidence
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Recording Evidence
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Recording Evidence
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Settlement
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
10-Jun-2025
Settlement
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Settlement
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2025
Settlement
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
14-Dec-2024
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
14-Jun-2024
Draft Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
10-May-2024
Mediation Report
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
19-Apr-2024
Mediation Report
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2024
Draft Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2024
Draft Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
21-Oct-2023
For Taking Steps
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2023
For Taking Steps
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
13-Jul-2023
For Taking Steps
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
29-Apr-2023
For Taking Steps
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2023
For Taking Steps
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2022
For Taking Steps
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2022
Affidavit Of Service
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2022
Affidavit Of Service
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
20-Jul-2022
For Apperance
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
06-Jun-2022
Compliance
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2022
Compliance
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2022
Compliance
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2021
Compliance
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2021
Compliance
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
23-Jul-2021
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
10-Jun-2021
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2021
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2021
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2020
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2020
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
14-Aug-2020
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
12-Jun-2020
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
27-May-2020
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
05-May-2020
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2020
Framing Issues
Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2020
Framing Issues
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
14-Jan-2020
Hearing
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2019
Hearing
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
11-Oct-2019
Report
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
07-Sep-2019
Report
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
26-Jul-2019
Report
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
10-Jul-2019
Chamber summonsView PDF
Case Summary: Mrs. Ekta v. Hemant Shantilal Shah & Ors (Case 101264/2017) The Bombay City Civil Court allowed the plaintiff's Chamber Summons to amend her plaint in a succession dispute. Mrs. Ekta, widow of deceased Hemchandra Shantilal Shah, sought to add paragraphs detailing: (1) her Succession Certificate obtained on 10 July 2018; and (2) allegations that her brother-in-law (Defendant No.1) fraudulently claimed Rs. 7.5 lakh in life insurance proceeds as the nominated beneficiary without informing her as the sole legal heir. The court permitted the amendment, finding it necessary to address the core controversy over entitlement to the deceased's demat account and insurance policies, with no prejudice to defendants who retained opportunity to respond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jul-2019
Report
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2019
C/S Hearing
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
06-Jun-2019
C/S Hearing
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
22-Mar-2019
C/S Hearing
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2019
C/S Hearing
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
27-Nov-2018
C/S Reply
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2018
C/S Reply
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
05-Sep-2018
C/S Reply
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
05-Jul-2018
Filing Say
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2018
Framing Issues
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2017
Dismissal
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
21-Sep-2017
Filing Affidavit Of Document
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
31-Aug-2017
Nm For Hearing
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
10-Aug-2017
Nm For Hearing
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
01-Aug-2017
Nm For Hearing
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2017
Nm For Hearing
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
19-Jul-2017
Affidavit Of Service
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
28-Jun-2017
Nm Replyrejoinder
Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
-
27-Jun-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-May-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 101264/2017
Case Summary: Mrs. Ekta v. Hemant Shantilal Shah & Ors (Case 101264/2017) The Bombay City Civil Court allowed the plaintiff's Chamber Summons to amend her plaint in a succession dispute. Mrs. Ekta, widow of deceased Hemchandra Shantilal Shah, sought to add paragraphs detailing: (1) her Succession Certificate obtained on 10 July 2018; and (2) allegations that her brother-in-law (Defendant No.1) fraudulently claimed Rs. 7.5 lakh in life insurance proceeds as the nominated beneficiary without informing her as the sole legal heir. The court permitted the amendment, finding it necessary to address the core controversy over entitlement to the deceased's demat account and insurance policies, with no prejudice to defendants who retained opportunity to respond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts