HAROON R N UMATIYA vs PANKTI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND 2 ORS Advocate - PRAKASH AND CO — 103017/2010

Status: Admission Denial. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Admission Denial Next hearing 16-Jul-2026

SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

CNR: MHCC010050892009

Filing Number

153017/2010

Filing Date

14-Dec-2009

Registration No

103017/2010

Registration Date

01-Oct-2012

Court

City Civil Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAROON R N UMATIYA

    Adv. E K SASIDHARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANKTI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND 2 ORS Advocate - PRAKASH AND CO

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  9. 02-Sep-2025

    Recording Evidence

  10. 21-Jun-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  11. 15-Mar-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  12. 07-Feb-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  13. 03-Jan-2025

    Restored

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  14. 03-Jan-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  15. 08-Jul-2016

    OtherView PDF

    On 08-07-2016, the Court of Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the suit filed by Haroon R N Umatiya against Pankti Developers Pvt Ltd and 2 others in default. The plaintiff and his advocate failed to appear despite the case being scheduled for passing a dismissal order, leading to the suit's dismissal. Costs were directed to be recovered accordingly and proceedings were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 08-Jul-2016

    Disposed

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  17. 14-Jun-2016

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  18. 02-Apr-2016

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  19. 17-Feb-2016

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  20. 21-Jan-2016

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  21. 21-Dec-2015

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  22. 23-Nov-2015

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  23. 03-Sep-2015

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  24. 20-Aug-2015

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  25. 06-Aug-2015

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  26. 06-Jul-2015

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  27. 11-Jun-2015

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  28. 12-Mar-2015

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  29. 19-Dec-2014

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  30. 04-Oct-2014

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  31. 11-Aug-2014

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  32. 11-Jul-2014

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  33. 16-Apr-2014

    Draft Issues

  34. 12-Feb-2014

    Draft Issues

  35. 17-Jan-2014

    Hearing

  36. 26-Nov-2013

    Directions

  37. 17-Oct-2013

    Directions

  38. 24-Jul-2013

    Hearing

  39. 19-Mar-2013

    Directions

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  40. 16-Feb-2013

    Directions

    Court 14 Addl Sessions Judge

  41. 02-Nov-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 14-Dec-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103017/2010

casestatus.in Summary

On 08-07-2016, the Court of Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the suit filed by Haroon R N Umatiya against Pankti Developers Pvt Ltd and 2 others in default. The plaintiff and his advocate failed to appear despite the case being scheduled for passing a dismissal order, leading to the suit's dismissal. Costs were directed to be recovered accordingly and proceedings were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case