HAROON RASHID NIZAMUDDIN UMATIYA vs PANKTI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND 2 ORS Advocate - PRAKASH AND CO — 104306/2009

Status: Admission Denial. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Admission Denial Next hearing 16-Jul-2026

SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

CNR: MHCC010044582009

Filing Number

154306/2009

Filing Date

01-Sep-2009

Registration No

104306/2009

Registration Date

01-Oct-2012

Court

City Civil Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAROON RASHID NIZAMUDDIN UMATIYA

    Adv. E K SASIDHARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANKTI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND 2 ORS Advocate - PRAKASH AND CO

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  9. 02-Sep-2025

    Recording Evidence

  10. 21-Jun-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  11. 15-Mar-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  12. 07-Feb-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  13. 03-Jan-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  14. 03-Jan-2025

    Restored

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  15. 19-Jul-2016

    OtherView PDF

    Case Summary: The suit filed by Haroon Rashid Nizamuddin Umatiya against Pankti Developers Pvt Ltd and 2 others was dismissed for default on 19-07-2016 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court 2. Despite being granted a final opportunity to proceed, the plaintiff and his advocate failed to appear in court, leading to dismissal. A bill of costs was ordered to be prepared accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 19-Jul-2016

    Disposed

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  17. 14-Jun-2016

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  18. 02-Apr-2016

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  19. 17-Feb-2016

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  20. 21-Jan-2016

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  21. 21-Dec-2015

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  22. 23-Nov-2015

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  23. 03-Sep-2015

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  24. 20-Aug-2015

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  25. 06-Aug-2015

    Dismissal

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  26. 06-Jul-2015

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  27. 11-Jun-2015

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  28. 12-Mar-2015

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  29. 19-Dec-2014

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  30. 04-Oct-2014

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  31. 11-Aug-2014

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  32. 11-Jul-2014

    Draft Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  33. 16-Apr-2014

    Draft Issues

  34. 12-Feb-2014

    Draft Issues

  35. 16-Dec-2013

    Framing Issues

  36. 23-Oct-2013

    Framing Issues

  37. 04-Jul-2013

    Framing Issues

  38. 26-Feb-2013

    For Taking Steps

    Court 15 Addl Sessions Judge

  39. 02-Nov-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 01-Sep-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104306/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The suit filed by Haroon Rashid Nizamuddin Umatiya against Pankti Developers Pvt Ltd and 2 others was dismissed for default on 19-07-2016 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court 2. Despite being granted a final opportunity to proceed, the plaintiff and his advocate failed to appear in court, leading to dismissal. A bill of costs was ordered to be prepared accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case