NESCO LTD vs ANAND MOOLYA Advocate - M S THAKORE JARIWALA AND ASSOCIATES — 103887/2011

Status: Admission Denial. Next hearing: 10th August 2026.

Admission Denial Next hearing 10-Aug-2026

SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

CNR: MHCC010044402011

Filing Number

153887/2011

Filing Date

18-May-2011

Registration No

103887/2011

Registration Date

01-Oct-2012

Court

City Civil Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NESCO LTD

    Adv. SACHIN JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANAND MOOLYA Advocate - M S THAKORE JARIWALA AND ASSOCIATES

Case History

  1. 10-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  4. 14-Jan-2026

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Nov-2025

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  6. 08-Oct-2025

    Admission Denial

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  7. 24-Sep-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  8. 24-Jun-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  9. 02-Apr-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  10. 10-Jan-2025

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  11. 05-Nov-2024

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  12. 27-Sep-2024

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  13. 15-Jul-2024

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  14. 18-Jun-2024

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  15. 04-Apr-2024

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  16. 02-Mar-2024

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  17. 31-Jan-2024

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  18. 21-Dec-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  19. 28-Nov-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  20. 28-Nov-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  21. 20-Oct-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  22. 20-Oct-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  23. 30-Sep-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  24. 30-Sep-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  25. 25-Aug-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  26. 25-Aug-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  27. 14-Jul-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  28. 14-Jul-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  29. 07-Jun-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  30. 07-Jun-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  31. 30-Mar-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  32. 24-Feb-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  33. 20-Jan-2023

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  34. 09-Dec-2022

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  35. 17-Oct-2022

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  36. 13-Sep-2022

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  37. 22-Jul-2022

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  38. 01-Jul-2022

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  39. 01-Jul-2022

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  40. 29-Apr-2022

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  41. 22-Mar-2022

    Nm Replyrejoinder

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  42. 22-Mar-2022

    Nm Replyrejoinder

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  43. 02-Feb-2022

    For___________________

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  44. 02-Feb-2022

    For___________________

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  45. 13-Dec-2021

    For___________________

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  46. 16-Nov-2021

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  47. 21-Sep-2021

    Order

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  48. 10-Aug-2021

    Order

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  49. 28-Jun-2021

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  50. 12-Apr-2021

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  51. 01-Mar-2021

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  52. 15-Jan-2021

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  53. 24-Nov-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  54. 24-Sep-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  55. 15-Jun-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  56. 28-May-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  57. 06-May-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  58. 06-May-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  59. 17-Apr-2020

    Reply

    Court 19 Principal Judge City CIVIL And Sessions Court

  60. 17-Apr-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  61. 31-Mar-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  62. 31-Mar-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  63. 11-Mar-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  64. 13-Feb-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  65. 15-Jan-2020

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  66. 03-Dec-2019

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  67. 06-Nov-2019

    Service

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  68. 18-Sep-2019

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  69. 19-Aug-2019

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  70. 10-Jul-2019

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  71. 24-Apr-2019

    Mediation Report

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  72. 25-Mar-2019

    Mediation Report

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  73. 05-Feb-2019

    Mediation Report

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  74. 16-Jan-2019

    Mediation Report

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  75. 08-Dec-2018

    Recording Evidence

  76. 03-Nov-2018

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  77. 26-Sep-2018

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  78. 14-Jul-2018

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  79. 04-Jul-2018

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  80. 25-Apr-2018

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  81. 12-Mar-2018

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  82. 15-Jan-2018

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  83. 08-Nov-2017

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  84. 03-Oct-2017

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  85. 10-Aug-2017

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  86. 04-Jul-2017

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  87. 12-Apr-2017

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  88. 27-Feb-2017

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  89. 06-Feb-2017

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  90. 19-Dec-2016

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  91. 17-Oct-2016

    Recording Evidence

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  92. 19-Aug-2016

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  93. 02-Aug-2016

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  94. 21-Jul-2016

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  95. 15-Apr-2016

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  96. 14-Dec-2015

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  97. 28-Sep-2015

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  98. 05-Aug-2015

    Framing Issues

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  99. 15-Jun-2015

    Notice of MotionView PDF

    Case Summary: NESCO LTD v. ANAND MOOLYA (2011/3887) Outcome: The defendant's notice of motion to file a delayed written statement was allowed. The court permitted the defendant to file his written statement (685 days late) upon payment of Rs. 2,000 costs to the plaintiff within one month. Key Facts: NESCO filed a suit for possession recovery. The defendant was served summons in July 2011 but failed to file a written statement within the required timeframe. The suit was transferred from High Court to City Civil Court due to jurisdiction changes, and the defendant claimed he was unaware of this transfer and the hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  100. 15-Jun-2015

    Compliance

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  101. 12-Jun-2015

    Order

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  102. 08-Apr-2015

    Nm Arguments

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  103. 06-Apr-2015

    Order

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  104. 19-Mar-2015

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  105. 13-Mar-2015

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  106. 22-Jan-2015

    Rejoinder

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  107. 10-Dec-2014

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  108. 21-Nov-2014

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  109. 10-Nov-2014

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  110. 18-Sep-2014

    Reply

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  111. 04-Aug-2014

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  112. 14-Jul-2014

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  113. 06-May-2014

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

  114. 09-Apr-2014

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

  115. 25-Feb-2014

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

  116. 13-Jan-2014

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

  117. 12-Nov-2013

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

  118. 02-Aug-2013

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

  119. 08-Jul-2013

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

  120. 02-May-2013

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  121. 01-Apr-2013

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  122. 12-Mar-2013

    Filing Affidavit Of Document

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  123. 25-Oct-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  124. 18-May-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103887/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NESCO LTD v. ANAND MOOLYA (2011/3887) Outcome: The defendant's notice of motion to file a delayed written statement was allowed. The court permitted the defendant to file his written statement (685 days late) upon payment of Rs. 2,000 costs to the plaintiff within one month. Key Facts: NESCO filed a suit for possession recovery. The defendant was served summons in July 2011 but failed to file a written statement within the required timeframe. The suit was transferred from High Court to City Civil Court due to jurisdiction changes, and the defendant claimed he was unaware of this transfer and the hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case