Rajendra Devji Kale vs Santosh Devji Kale — 100591/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

NOTICE OF MOTION

CNR: MHCC010008632026

Filing Number

100870/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

100591/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

City Civil Court, Mumbai

Judge

2-Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajendra Devji Kale

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR R MAURYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Devji Kale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Notice of MotionView PDF

    Case Summary: Rajendra Devji Kale v. Santosh Devji Kale (100591/2026) The Bombay City Civil Court granted plaintiff Rajendra Devji Kale's temporary injunction restraining his brother (defendant Santosh Devji Kale) from forcibly dispossessing him from their disputed residential flat. The court found the plaintiff established prima facie possession rights and that the balance of convenience favored protecting his continued occupation during trial, as forced eviction would cause irreparable hardship that money cannot remedy. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's request to bar third-party transfers, finding insufficient evidence of immediate alienation risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  4. 07-May-2026

    Nm Orders

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Nm Orders

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Nm For Hearing

    Court 02 Addl Sessions Judge

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100591/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rajendra Devji Kale v. Santosh Devji Kale (100591/2026) The Bombay City Civil Court granted plaintiff Rajendra Devji Kale's temporary injunction restraining his brother (defendant Santosh Devji Kale) from forcibly dispossessing him from their disputed residential flat. The court found the plaintiff established prima facie possession rights and that the balance of convenience favored protecting his continued occupation during trial, as forced eviction would cause irreparable hardship that money cannot remedy. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's request to bar third-party transfers, finding insufficient evidence of immediate alienation risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case