Firdaus D. Mehta and 1 other vs Strand CHSL — 87/2025

Case under The Maharashtra Co Operative Socites Act 1961 Section 97. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 10-Jul-2026 this date has passed

A O - Appeal Against Order

CNR: MHCA010002472025

Filing Number

242/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Registration No

87/2025

Registration Date

26-Dec-2025

Court

Co-operative Appellate Court Mumbai

Judge

3-Member 2

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

The Maharashtra Co Operative Socites Act 1961 Section 97

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Firdaus D. Mehta and 1 other

    Adv. S.L. Suryavanshi, Kalpita Sane

  2. 2.H.F. Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Strand CHSL

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Member 2

  3. 04-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 87/2025 Summary The Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court allowed Strand CHS Ltd.'s application to produce two documents: the Maharashtra Electric Vehicle Policy 2025 (Government Resolution dated 23/05/2025) and a TATA Motors dealer letter dated 12/08/2025 regarding vehicle charging time. Although the appellants objected on grounds that these documents were not previously produced before the trial court, the court found both documents necessary for proper adjudication—the government resolution requiring judicial notice and the dealer letter constituting expert opinion relevant to the dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    Arguments

    Member 2

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Order

    Member 2

  6. 23-Apr-2026

    Order

    Member 2

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Member 2

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Member 2

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Reply Unready

    Member 2

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 87/2025 Summary The Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court allowed Strand CHS Ltd.'s application to produce two documents: the Maharashtra Electric Vehicle Policy 2025 (Government Resolution dated 23/05/2025) and a TATA Motors dealer letter dated 12/08/2025 regarding vehicle charging time. Although the appellants objected on grounds that these documents were not previously produced before the trial court, the court found both documents necessary for proper adjudication—the government resolution requiring judicial notice and the dealer letter constituting expert opinion relevant to the dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case