Vaibhav Girish Umalkar vs State of Maharashtra Through Sub Divisional Officer Mehkar — 181/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39rule1and2rwSection151. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHBU210005872025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
11-08-2025
Filing Number
636/2025
Filing Date
13-08-2025
Registration No
181/2025
Registration Date
13-08-2025
Court
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Mehkar
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vaibhav Girish Umalkar
Adv. Kale T.M
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Sub Divisional Officer Mehkar
State of Maharashtra Through Collector Buldhana
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 21-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 08-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 181/2025, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to produce documents as per the list at Exhibit 30, finding them material and necessary for fair trial and merit adjudication. The defendants failed to file their response, and the court noted they retain rebuttal rights with no prejudice. No order on costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 181/2025, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to produce documents as per the list at Exhibit 30, finding them material and necessary for fair trial and merit adjudication. The defendants failed to file their response, and the court noted they retain rebuttal rights with no prejudice. No order on costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts