Ramkinsan Savairam Rathod vs Jagadish Chautulal Supatyan — 101/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHBU210004592024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
448/2024
Filing Date
25-05-2024
Registration No
101/2024
Registration Date
25-05-2024
Court
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Mehkar
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramkinsan Savairam Rathod
Adv. Davhale VB
Respondent(s)
Jagadish Chautulal Supatyan
parkash Chotulal Supatyan
Satyanarayan Chautulal Supatyan
Radheshyam Chautulal Supatyan
Deputy Superintendent Land Records Office Lonar
Tahasildar Saheb Tahasil Office Lonar
Office of Superintendent of Police Lonar
Talahati Office Gandhari
Circle Officer Office Titvi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 09-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 05-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 03-12-2025 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Mehkar rejected the application (Application No. 32) filed by defendants 1 and 2 seeking dismissal of the suit under CPC Order 7 Rule 11(a) and (b) read with Section 151. The court found no valid grounds for dismissal as the defendants failed to establish that the plaintiff lacked proper cause of action or that the defendants had not sold the land in question. The suit (Civil Case No. 101/2024) was permitted to proceed, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Mehkar rejected the application (Application No. 32) filed by defendants 1 and 2 seeking dismissal of the suit under CPC Order 7 Rule 11(a) and (b) read with Section 151. The court found no valid grounds for dismissal as the defendants failed to establish that the plaintiff lacked proper cause of action or that the defendants had not sold the land in question. The suit (Civil Case No. 101/2024) was permitted to proceed, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts