Ramkinsan Savairam Rathod vs Jagadish Chautulal Supatyan — 101/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHBU210004592024

Awaiting Notice

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

448/2024

Filing Date

25-05-2024

Registration No

101/2024

Registration Date

25-05-2024

Court

Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Mehkar

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 21

Petitioner(s)

Ramkinsan Savairam Rathod

Adv. Davhale VB

Respondent(s)

Jagadish Chautulal Supatyan

parkash Chotulal Supatyan

Satyanarayan Chautulal Supatyan

Radheshyam Chautulal Supatyan

Deputy Superintendent Land Records Office Lonar

Tahasildar Saheb Tahasil Office Lonar

Office of Superintendent of Police Lonar

Talahati Office Gandhari

Circle Officer Office Titvi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION

18-04-2026

Awaiting Notice

11-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

09-02-2026

Awaiting Notice

05-01-2026

Awaiting Notice

03-12-2025

Awaiting Notice

Interim Orders

29-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Mehkar rejected the application (Application No. 32) filed by defendants 1 and 2 seeking dismissal of the suit under CPC Order 7 Rule 11(a) and (b) read with Section 151. The court found no valid grounds for dismissal as the defendants failed to establish that the plaintiff lacked proper cause of action or that the defendants had not sold the land in question. The suit (Civil Case No. 101/2024) was permitted to proceed, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Mehkar rejected the application (Application No. 32) filed by defendants 1 and 2 seeking dismissal of the suit under CPC Order 7 Rule 11(a) and (b) read with Section 151. The court found no valid grounds for dismissal as the defendants failed to establish that the plaintiff lacked proper cause of action or that the defendants had not sold the land in question. The suit (Civil Case No. 101/2024) was permitted to proceed, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Mehkar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case