Durga Gajanan Mule vs Baliram Parshram Lahudkar Advocate - Shewale R. G. — 19/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order39rule1,2. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHBU210004062023
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
01-07-2023
Filing Number
414/2023
Filing Date
04-07-2023
Registration No
19/2023
Registration Date
04-07-2023
Court
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Mehkar
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Durga Gajanan Mule
Adv. LAHOTI SAGAR RADHESHYAM
Respondent(s)
Baliram Parshram Lahudkar Advocate - Shewale R. G.
Shriram Parshram Lahudkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
Reply/Say
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Spl.C.S. No.19/2023 (Durga Gajanan Mule v/s. Baliram Parshram Lahudkar & anr.), the Civil Judge allowed the plaintiff's application to produce documents listed at Exhibit 24, finding them material and necessary for fair trial and merit-based adjudication. The court noted that defendants retain opportunity for rebuttal and would suffer no prejudice. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Spl.C.S. No.19/2023 (Durga Gajanan Mule v/s. Baliram Parshram Lahudkar & anr.), the Civil Judge allowed the plaintiff's application to produce documents listed at Exhibit 24, finding them material and necessary for fair trial and merit-based adjudication. The court noted that defendants retain opportunity for rebuttal and would suffer no prejudice. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts