Dattatray @ Dattu Shriram Murkut vs Rajendra Shivaji Murkut Advocate - Nikas JG — 65/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ---. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHBU210003272023
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
333/2023
Filing Date
25-05-2023
Registration No
65/2023
Registration Date
25-05-2023
Court
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Mehkar
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattatray @ Dattu Shriram Murkut
Adv. Sangle NB
Shivraj Dattur Murkut Minor through gaurdian mother Manda Dattatray Murkut
Smt. Yashoda Shriram Murkut
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Shivaji Murkut Advocate - Nikas JG
Sau. Vimal Rajendra Murkut
Adv. Nikas JG
Manjula Vishnu Bhore
Collector, Buldana
Tahsildar, Sindkhed Raja
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 22-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 04-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted petition no. 33 and appointed Court Commissioner A.P. Jadhav to conduct an on-site inspection of a disputed road. The petitioner was directed to deposit ₹3,000 as court commissioner fees, and the commissioner was instructed to submit an inspection report with photographs and documentary evidence within two weeks regarding the actual status of the disputed road between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted petition no. 33 and appointed Court Commissioner A.P. Jadhav to conduct an on-site inspection of a disputed road. The petitioner was directed to deposit ₹3,000 as court commissioner fees, and the commissioner was instructed to submit an inspection report with photographs and documentary evidence within two weeks regarding the actual status of the disputed road between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts