Ramkisan Aashru Kalambe vs Fakira Tukaram Wagh Advocate - Pacharne VP — 19/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section --. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHBU210001312020
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
134/2020
Filing Date
09-06-2020
Registration No
19/2020
Registration Date
09-06-2020
Court
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Mehkar
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramkisan Aashru Kalambe
Adv. Sangle NB
Prahlad Aashru Kalambe
Shivhari Aashru Kalambe
Rudhabai J. Trambak Ambhore
Susilabai J. Sakharam Padghan
Respondent(s)
Fakira Tukaram Wagh Advocate - Pacharne VP
Raju Dattaray Wagh
Dattaray Aashru Tangade
State Of Maharashtra Through Talathi Partapur Ukli
Maharastra State Through Circle Commitee Officer, Anjani Bu.
Maharastra State Through Collector Buldana
Maharastra State Through S. D. O. Mehkar
Maharastra State Through Tasildar Mehkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition was dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's plea to cancel a prior order dated 24.02.2020 issued by defendant No. 8 regarding a road/plot dispute. The court found no valid grounds for dismissal and upheld the earlier order, directing that defendant No. 8's decision regarding land survey and registration be implemented as per government guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition was dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's plea to cancel a prior order dated 24.02.2020 issued by defendant No. 8 regarding a road/plot dispute. The court found no valid grounds for dismissal and upheld the earlier order, directing that defendant No. 8's decision regarding land survey and registration be implemented as per government guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts