Sanjay Arjun Kharde vs Panchafula Arjun Kharde — 1/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Succession

CNR: MHBU210000442026

e-Filing Number

15-01-2026

Filing Number

44/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Mehkar

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Senior Division

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Arjun Kharde

    Adv. Jadhao NB

  2. 2.Ganesh Arjun Kharde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Panchafula Arjun Kharde

  2. 2.Gita Prakash Dahale

  3. 3.State Bank Of India Through Its Branch Manager

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: In Succession No. 1/2026 (Sanjay Arjun Kharde & anr. v/s. Panchfula Arjun Kharde & others), the Civil Judge allowed non-applicant No. 3's application to produce documents listed at Exhibit 24, finding them material and necessary for fair trial and merit adjudication. The applicants were given an opportunity to file rebuttal, and no order as to costs was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division

  10. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Succession No. 1/2026 (Sanjay Arjun Kharde & anr. v/s. Panchfula Arjun Kharde & others), the Civil Judge allowed non-applicant No. 3's application to produce documents listed at Exhibit 24, finding them material and necessary for fair trial and merit adjudication. The applicants were given an opportunity to file rebuttal, and no order as to costs was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case