Anirudh Daulatrao Mundhe vs Sindhubai Vitthal Munde Advocate - Lahoti SR — 169/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,41,1. Status: Notice Ready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.A. - Civil Appeal
CNR: MHBU200010492019
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
961/2019
Filing Date
30-01-2017
Registration No
169/2019
Registration Date
30-01-2017
Court
District Court and Addl.Sessions Court, Mehkar
Judge
2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.S.J.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anirudh Daulatrao Mundhe
Adv. Davhale VB
Respondent(s)
Sindhubai Vitthal Munde Advocate - Lahoti SR
Vitthal Uttam Mundhe
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.S.J.
Notice Ready
Notice Ready
Notice Ready
Notice Ready
Notice Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Notice Ready |
| 11-03-2026 | Notice Ready |
| 21-01-2026 | Notice Ready |
| 03-12-2025 | Notice Ready |
| 01-11-2025 | Notice Ready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The stay application is allowed. The District Court of Mehkar stayed the execution and operation of the trial court's judgment and decree dated 09-08-2016 (which ordered removal of encroachment and restoration of land possession to the plaintiff) pending disposal of the present appeal. The court found that executing the decree would render the appeal infructuous since the appellant is currently in possession of the disputed land, and as the first appellate court, fresh appreciation of evidence and facts is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The stay application is allowed. The District Court of Mehkar stayed the execution and operation of the trial court's judgment and decree dated 09-08-2016 (which ordered removal of encroachment and restoration of land possession to the plaintiff) pending disposal of the present appeal. The court found that executing the decree would render the appeal infructuous since the appellant is currently in possession of the disputed land, and as the first appellate court, fresh appreciation of evidence and facts is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts