State of Maha (PSO Sakharkherda) vs Devidas Sitaram Tale Advocate - Dinode AR — 48/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,307,324,504,506,34. Status: Production of Accused. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU200007242024
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
396/2024
Filing Date
13-11-2024
Registration No
48/2024
Registration Date
13-11-2024
Court
District Court and Addl.Sessions Court, Mehkar
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
110
Police Station
S.Kherda
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maha (PSO Sakharkherda)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Devidas Sitaram Tale Advocate - Dinode AR
Pawan Devidas Tale
Shrikrushana Alias Litar Devidas Tale
Godavari Devidas Tale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 04-05-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 20-04-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 08-04-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 06-04-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of Devidas Sitaram Tale, accused of murder (Section 302 IPC) and related offenses in connection with the death of Eknath, was rejected. The Additional Sessions Judge found that the applicant was the prime accused with a significantly different and more culpable role compared to co-accused already released on bail, having allegedly struck the fatal blow with an iron rod. Concerns about potential witness tampering and flight from justice, combined with the serious nature of the charges, outweighed bail considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of Devidas Sitaram Tale, accused of murder (Section 302 IPC) and related offenses in connection with the death of Eknath, was rejected. The Additional Sessions Judge found that the applicant was the prime accused with a significantly different and more culpable role compared to co-accused already released on bail, having allegedly struck the fatal blow with an iron rod. Concerns about potential witness tampering and flight from justice, combined with the serious nature of the charges, outweighed bail considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts