Nagesh Lokduji Kangane vs State of Maha (PSO Mehkar) Advocate - APP — 63/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU200001352026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
109/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
District Court and Addl.Sessions Court, Mehkar
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
157
Police Station
Mehkar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nagesh Lokduji Kangane
Adv. Wakode SS
Respondent(s)
State of Maha (PSO Mehkar) Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted pre-arrest bail to Nagesh Lokdujee Kangane in Criminal Bail Application No. 63/2026. The applicant was charged under IPC Sections 75, 356(3) and IT Act Section 67 for allegedly making defamatory social media comments about the complainant. The court found that while comments were made on the accused's Facebook account, no specific name was mentioned in the posts, and the investigation was still incomplete. Considering the nature of the offense (no death or life imprisonment provision), the applicant's cooperation with investigation, and absence of criminal history, the court conditionally granted bail with personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and several conditions including weekly police reporting and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted pre-arrest bail to Nagesh Lokdujee Kangane in Criminal Bail Application No. 63/2026. The applicant was charged under IPC Sections 75, 356(3) and IT Act Section 67 for allegedly making defamatory social media comments about the complainant. The court found that while comments were made on the accused's Facebook account, no specific name was mentioned in the posts, and the investigation was still incomplete. Considering the nature of the offense (no death or life imprisonment provision), the applicant's cooperation with investigation, and absence of criminal history, the court conditionally granted bail with personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and several conditions including weekly police reporting and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts