Pravin Bramhanand Mhaske vs State of Maha (PSO Bibi) Advocate - APP — 56/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU200001182026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
93/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
56/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District Court and Addl.Sessions Court, Mehkar
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
Bibi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pravin Bramhanand Mhaske
Adv. Wakle S.A
Bramhanand Ananda Maske
Pradip Bramhanand Maske
Respondent(s)
State of Maha (PSO Bibi) Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Disposed
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court approved the bail application of three accused (Pravin Brahmananand Mhaske, Brahmananand Ananda Mhaske, and Pradeep Brahmananand Maske) in a dowry death case. The court found the FIR defective due to vague allegations and lack of specific mention of illegal demands, combined with the accused's clean criminal record and cooperation during investigation. The accused were released on bail of ₹50,000 each with strict conditions including regular appearance before the investigation officer and restrictions on witness tampering and leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court approved the bail application of three accused (Pravin Brahmananand Mhaske, Brahmananand Ananda Mhaske, and Pradeep Brahmananand Maske) in a dowry death case. The court found the FIR defective due to vague allegations and lack of specific mention of illegal demands, combined with the accused's clean criminal record and cooperation during investigation. The accused were released on bail of ₹50,000 each with strict conditions including regular appearance before the investigation officer and restrictions on witness tampering and leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts