Vimalbai Brahmanand Maske vs State of Maha (PSO Bibi) Advocate - APP — 55/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU200001172026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
92/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
55/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District Court and Addl.Sessions Court, Mehkar
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
Bibi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vimalbai Brahmanand Maske
Adv. Wakle S.A
Respondent(s)
State of Maha (PSO Bibi) Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Disposed
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted pre-arrest bail to Vimalbai Bramhanand Maske in a criminal bail application (Crl. Bail No. 55/2026). The applicant was accused of abetting the suicide of her daughter-in-law Rohini by subjecting her to harassment and demands for dowry. The court found the FIR defective (one-day delay in filing, vague charges, no specific amount of illegal demand mentioned) and noted the applicant's clean record and willingness to cooperate in investigation, ordering her release on personal bond of ₹50,000 with strict conditions including regular appearance before the investigating officer and restrictions on contacting witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted pre-arrest bail to Vimalbai Bramhanand Maske in a criminal bail application (Crl. Bail No. 55/2026). The applicant was accused of abetting the suicide of her daughter-in-law Rohini by subjecting her to harassment and demands for dowry. The court found the FIR defective (one-day delay in filing, vague charges, no specific amount of illegal demand mentioned) and noted the applicant's clean record and willingness to cooperate in investigation, ordering her release on personal bond of ₹50,000 with strict conditions including regular appearance before the investigating officer and restrictions on contacting witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts