Shrikhand Devidas Holkar vs State of Maha (PSO Lonar) Advocate - APP — 44/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU200000992026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
78/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
44/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District Court and Addl.Sessions Court, Mehkar
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
Lonar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shrikhand Devidas Holkar
Adv. Palve S.S
Respondent(s)
State of Maha (PSO Lonar) Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Disposed
Order
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Order |
| 27-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted conditional pre-arrest bail to Shrikhanda Devidas Holkar in a case involving allegations of outraging modesty, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt (IPC sections 294, 354, 506, 323). The judge found the defendant had no criminal history, was willing to cooperate with investigation, and the charges appeared disputed based on neutral witness statements. The bail was granted subject to conditions including furnishing a Rs. 50,000 bond, weekly reporting to the investigating officer, not tampering with witnesses, and staying within specified limits until the charge sheet is filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted conditional pre-arrest bail to Shrikhanda Devidas Holkar in a case involving allegations of outraging modesty, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt (IPC sections 294, 354, 506, 323). The judge found the defendant had no criminal history, was willing to cooperate with investigation, and the charges appeared disputed based on neutral witness statements. The bail was granted subject to conditions including furnishing a Rs. 50,000 bond, weekly reporting to the investigating officer, not tampering with witnesses, and staying within specified limits until the charge sheet is filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts